My New Blog

CHFA program update
July 21st, 2010 3:03 PM

CHFA announced that effective with all reservations beginning July 1, 2010, participating lenders will be able to serve higher income single person households and more non-first time homebuyers.

  • New 2010 Income and Purchase Price Limits for all programs.
     
  • 1 person and 2 person household income limits have been combined into one Income Limit. In the past, many of CHFA's programs had 3 income limit categories: 1 person, 2 persons and 3+ persons. Now there will be 2 income categories for most of our programs: 1-2 persons (income limit based on 100% of area median income/AMI for that county) and 3+ persons (income limit based on 115% of AMI).
     
  • The First time homebuyer requirement is waived for Borrowers purchasing Property located in Targeted Areas. CHFA will now allow non-first time homebuyers who meet the CHFA FirstStep/FirstStep Plus program guidelines to obtain a loan in this program provided the Property is located within a Targeted Area of Colorado. Qualifying non-first time homebuyers can also obtain a CHFA Statewide MCC provided the Property is located in a Targeted Area of Colorado. Note: FirstStep/FirstStep Plus and MCC may not be combined but HomeOpener/HomeOpener Plus may be combined with a MCC, provided Borrower meets guidelines of both programs. New income limits can be found here and more information about Targeted Areas can be found here.

Posted by Ray Williams on July 21st, 2010 3:03 PMPost a Comment (0)

Denver Mortgage rates hit all time lows
July 2nd, 2010 10:50 AM

You probably have heard the radio advertisements for low rates. I was comparing the mortgage backed security (MBS) trading for the last two years and came across something interesting. The MBS is trading at around the same levels as they were in November 2008 when we saw rate not as low as this.

What does that mean?

My hunch tells me that since loan applications have fallen after the expiration of the first time home buyer tax credit, that the banks have decided that they need to infuse a new stream of applications for business through refinances. By releasing more yield to the lending world, we then are able to offer lower rates to attract you to refinance.

Should you refinance now?

Get some sound advice on whether it makes sense to refinance versus just being presented an offer. By spending 30 minutes with you I can let you know if it makes sense to pursue a refinance. All things go into the equation like how long does it take to make up your closing costs, are you going to sell in the next couple years, are you planning on paying this home off, are there other debts you could pay off to improve your financial situation with a skipped payment????

Give me a call to discuss your situation and spend 30 minutes learning if it makes sense for you to refinance or stay put.

Ray

303.779.0591 x101


Posted by Ray Williams on July 2nd, 2010 10:50 AMPost a Comment (0)

Proposed rule change to Regulation Z, and the myth about YSP
March 30th, 2010 9:05 AM

We know the Federal Reserve Board doesn't fully understand the impact the proposed rule changes to Reg Z will have on consumers. Part of the proposed rule change will impact ow loan originators are compensated for their work. For the most part the industry has corrected the problems that existed a few years ago. Recently we had to adopt a new HUD settlement statement as a result of transparency on fees to consumers for the sake of shopping for better home loans. Also, there have been implemented changes to appraisals that maintain appraiser independence.

Whether you feel those were good or bad changes, they have happened. Now the FRB is trying to change how originators are compensated, through adopting critical changes to Regulation Z.

Here is a brief excerpt from the IMMAAG position statement, but I urge you to visit www.frbcalltoaction.info and help us out. "

The Board has stated that its intention in 226.36 (d) is to prevent deceptive practices and unfairness. In order to implement that “protection” the Board proposes that it will:

· Prohibit certain payments to a mortgage broker or a loan officer that are based on the loan’s terms and conditions.

· Prohibit a mortgage broker or loan officer from ‘‘steering’’ consumers to transactions that are not in their interest in order to increase the mortgage broker’s or loan officer’s compensation.

The Board is only authorized to implement these changes if the change is needed to prevent deceptive practices or unfairness.

On page 43237 in support of what it considers to constitute deceptive or unfair, the Board cites FTC requirements:

“First, there must be a representation, omission or practice that is likely to mislead the consumer.


Second, the act or practice is examined from the perspective of a consumer acting reasonably in the circumstances.

Third, the representation, omission, or practice must be material. That is, it must be likely to affect the consumer’s conduct or decision with regard to a product or service.”

Since the costs incurred by the borrower are clearly the combination of the front end costs, which the Board cites in its rule are fully and transparently provided by the Good Faith Estimate (See page 43234) and by the disclosure of the loan’s interest rate, there is nothing in the compensation paid from a lender to an originator that triggers any of the FTC tests.

Consumers know exactly what their costs are. If the originator offers a higher interest and it happens to provide a higher share of the lender revenue to the originator, the consumer is neither deceived nor treated unfairly because the consumer is fully aware of their costs through the disclosure of the interest rate and the consumer is free to locate another loan source at will."

Please visit www.frbcalltoaction.info and help out by passing along.

Ray

Posted by Ray Williams on March 30th, 2010 9:05 AMPost a Comment (0)

Mortgage Credit Certificate News
February 11th, 2010 6:18 PM

Are you aware of the refinance or purchase opportunity using the Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC)? This credit is separate from the first time home buyer tax credit. For a refinance you must currently have an adjustable rate mortgage, you closed on, between 1/1/2002-12/31/2007. To use this tax credit when financing your home you must work with an approved MCC lender. Here is an example of how it works:

Here is an example for a client who just bought a condo at $128,500~

Ok, so the breakdown for the MCC aspect is like this:

Mortgage: $125,681

Rate: 5.125% (A.P.R 5.755%)

Annual interest: $6441.15 (125,681 * .05125)

MCC is 20% credit of that annual interest: $1,288.23 (6441.15 * .20)

$1,288.23 / 12 (months) = $107.35 (per month)

The $107.35 per month represents how much your MCC benefits you on a monthly basis. So you can adjust your W4 to increase your withholding number. You will want to increase the number so you have $107.35 less of total federal income tax taken out of your check per month.

At the end of the year you will need to fill out the IRS FORM 8396. This is where the IRS knows (applies) you are to receive the tax credit towards your filing.


For more information consult an MCC approved lender. This STATEWIDE program is limited to available funds, so make sure to ask your professional if they can offer this to you or visit http://www.milehigh.com/housing/for-sale/mcc-program


Posted by Ray Williams on February 11th, 2010 6:18 PMPost a Comment (0)

First Time Buyer Tax Credit
November 4th, 2009 12:34 PM

It appears that with the Senate 85-2 vote on the amendments to H.R.3548, the Unemployment Compensation Extension bill; we may actually achieve an extension and an expansion of the First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit. Highlights, if the amendment, as considered in the Senate is passed with the Unemployment bill, include:

>  A purchase transaction will qualify for those entering a binding contract before May 1, 2010 with a closing date before July 1, 2010.

>  The credit is up to $8,000 for a married couple. ($4,000 individual)

>  The original tax credit provision is expanded to include purchasers who have resided for 5 consecutive years (out of the past eight years) in their primary residence to qualify for a tax credit of up to $6,500 ($3,250 individual) on the purchase of a new primary residence.

>  Income levels have increased to $125,000 (single [was $75,000]) and $225,000 (couple [was $150,000]).

>  If the purchase price is greater than $800,000 no credit is allowed. 

>  Persons stationed outside the United States on official duty for 90 days during the period after 12/31/2008 and before 5/1/2010 will have eligibility extended for binding contracts signed before 5/1/2011  and closed before July 1, 2011.


Posted by Ray Williams on November 4th, 2009 12:34 PMPost a Comment (0)

Colorado faces potential loss of half its mortgage brokers
August 5th, 2009 7:17 PM

You might want to make sure here next month that your mortgage lender is legally doing business for you here in Colorado. It turns out a very interesting story was emailed to me from our corporate attorney this evening.

Colorado Faces Potential Loss of Half its Mortgage Brokers

Nearly half of the 8,729 licensed mortgage brokers in Colorado have failed to meet new state requirements and face losing their licenses Aug. 31. “We could be looking at a complete disaster,” Erin Toll, director of the Colorado Division of Real Estate, told the Denver Business Journal.

After Colorado enacted its mortgage broker licensing law in January 2008, all licensed brokers had one year to complete 40 hours of licensing education and pass a written test. By December of 2008, nearly 6,000 brokers had not fulfilled the new requirements. To avoid a potential blow to the state’s credit markets by revoking the licenses of a significant percentage of brokers at one time, the Division of Real Estate subsequently granted a 90-day extension.

However, as of July 2009, more than 4,000 brokers still had not met the requirements to maintain licensure. According to Douglas Braden, past president of the Colorado Association of Mortgage Brokers, if those brokers are active practitioners, and half of them lose their licenses next month, it certainly will present a significant problem for the state.

“When you take that many people that potentially were well-qualified, that were doing good business for consumers, and you take those allies away from consumers, it leaves them a whole lot less choice,” Braden told the Journal. “Less choice and more restrictive guidelines don’t mean we’re going to make more loans. It means we’re going to make a lot less loans, a lot less people are going to qualify and a lot less people are going to have someone in their corner.”

If you are not sure, don't take the chance with your families largest financial decision. Work with a licensed mortgage professional.
 
Ray~

Posted by Ray Williams on August 5th, 2009 7:17 PMPost a Comment (0)

Income tax incentive for first time buyers in Colorado revised
July 17th, 2009 3:47 PM

So you may have read my blog about the Denver mortgage credit certificate that is available. However, that is for just the city and county of Denver. Now there is a complimentary mortgage credit certificate available for the whole state. To learn more about the mortgage credit certificate and what it means to you in general as a first time buyer in Colorado, email or check out my webpage at www.myonlinemortgage.net/mcc Make note that the Denver MCC is similiar to the statewide version I am writing about today.

 

Ray


Posted by Ray Williams on July 17th, 2009 3:47 PMPost a Comment (0)

Can you still offer less then the list price on a house in Denver right now?
June 23rd, 2009 7:29 PM

One would say with all the media attention that you should be able to put an offer on a house in Denver for far less then the list price. Afterall, they say the market is soft and there are a glutton of foreclosures out there. I wanted to give you a quick snapshot of what is really going on in the housing industry here in the metro area.

For example did you know there are public websites that show you data on trends of what houses are listed for versus what they sold for?

Here are a few examples:

20040 Mitchell Cir Denver~ Listed for: $135,000 and sold for: $155,000

7157 Huron St Denver~ Listed for $105,000 and sold for $131,500

6971 Saulsbury St Arvada~ Listed for $135,000 and sold for $175,000

7179 S Kline St Littleton~ listed for $200,000 and sold for $250,000

So there is Denver, Littleton, and Arvada as examples. This is even happening in Aurora as well guys. So what I am getting at is don't completely think when going to make your offer that you can write it for whatever you want and the seller will cave in to sell to you. This is good signs that our market is stronger then you expect from what you might hear on the news. Keep in mind that these examples are bank owned homes, so you can imagine that they needed some work. Now think how an individual selling their own home with pride of ownership will be sitting if they want to sell at a reasonable price right now??

Also, if you have friends buying they may be able to tell you as many of my agent friends have. It is tough to get an offer accepted because the competition is fierce right now.

My advice is to be ready! Meaning have all your financial ducks in a row with a pre-approval not a pre-qualification. Make sure you are ready to write your offer and not hesitate or think through it too long, unless you don't care too much if you miss out on that specific house. While all this is going on, you can still get the sellers to pay closing costs, but if this continues to strengthen you will have less luck with the sellers willingness to pay closing costs for you.

Happy house hunting~

Ray


Posted by Ray Williams on June 23rd, 2009 7:29 PMPost a Comment (0)

Learn how to give yourself a 20% pay raise when you buy your first home in Denver! (Mortgage Credit Certificate)
June 18th, 2009 11:10 AM

You may be thinking to yourself there is no way to give yourself a pay raise when you buy your home. What if you could buy your first home in Denver using a mortgage credit certificate that would allow you to adjust your W4 and take home more money every paycheck? What if that money directly allowed you to buy a home that were 20% more expensive than what you could qualify for without the mortgage credit certificate?

It is all true and not a sham! There is a program out from the City and County of Denver for qualified first time buyers to take advantage of a mortgage credit certificate. This certificate gives you the legal right to adjust your W4 filing with the I.R.S and take home 20% of the mortgage interest you would otherwise deduct from your taxes. So it becomes direct benefit to your finances when you buy, not later.

HOW does it work?

Let's say you bought a $175,000 home at 5.25% for a 30 year mortgage. We know you would pay roughly $9,187 in annual mortgage interest ($175,000 @ 5.25% = $9,187). Now take 20% of that $1837 for your annual mortgage credit certificate. From there you take the $1837 divided by 12 months and get a credit for $153 per month that you can have added back to your pay after you buy!

So, if your home payment (interest, taxes, mortgage insurance) on a $175,000 home were $1,027, then you would only have to qualify for $874 per month and in essence you could choose to qualify for more home, if you chose!

To learn more visit http://www.milehigh.com/housing/for-sale/mcc-program and you will see my number as an approved lender (the list is very short of approved lenders by the city and county)~

Call with questions~

Ray

303.779.0591 ext. 101


Posted by Ray Williams on June 18th, 2009 11:10 AMPost a Comment (0)

What happened to mortgage rates? Did they really go up .5%
June 9th, 2009 8:53 AM

You may have heard or start to hear, that mortgage rates have gone up. In fact on new loans I am doing, I have seen anywhere from a .5-.75% increase in rates since May 21st.

So what is the reason for all of this you ask? Even though the fed is buying mortgage backed securities, they are being offset by the supply of mortgage backed securities hitting the market. The reason for this new supply is the result of all the mortgages that have closed as a result of the lower rates. Those mortgages have now been securitized and are being sold on the open market as mortgage backed securities. This new supply is offsetting the purchasing power of the fed and just may lead us to higher rates. As you can imagine there are still loads of mortgages that will be securitized and sold as mortgage backed securities. This could offset anything the fed can do in purchasing more mortgage backed securities.

My advice, if you were waiting for lower rates to refinance, you may miss the boat as the anchor seems to have been pulled.

 

 


Posted by Ray Williams on June 9th, 2009 8:53 AMPost a Comment (0)

Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Summit Home Mortgage 1720 S Bellaire St #315 Denver, CO 80222
Phone: Fax:

Loan Application | Request Industry Info | Gifts as Downpayment | My Blog

Copyright © 2010 Summit Home Mortgage
Portions Copyright © 2010 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Terms of UseSite Map